Project
rethinking grading: exploring feedback, mastery, and meaning
research
Design thinking
class project

what if grades stopped being a measure of worth and became a tool for growth?
exploring the current landscape
We can imagine something better — and small shifts can lead us there.

What would assessment look like if it was built around care, trust, and reflection?
I imagine systems where:
Feedback is ongoing and collaborative
Mistakes are part of learning, not something to hide
Students can choose how they demonstrate understanding
Faculty feel supported to try new approaches and build community around better assessment practices
These ideas may sound idealistic, but they are already happening in small pockets. The challenge is learning how to expand them.
Reflection:
This project reminded me that grading is not just a technical issue. It is cultural, emotional, and deeply tied to how students see themselves as learners. Rethinking it requires more than new tools or rubrics. It requires new values.
Using the Three Horizons framework helped me understand that change can happen in stages. We can improve the present, support what’s emerging, and keep imagining what’s possible.
This work deepened my interest in designing systems that support growth and equity. It also reminded me that asking better questions can be a powerful design practice.
Read the full paper:
details
Research methods
Literature review
Comparative analysis
Design methods, frameworks, theories
Design thinking
Systems thinking
Three Horizons
Feedback literacy
Mastery learning
Vice President, Strategic Education Initiatives and Professor of English
Randall Bass
Vice President for Research and Senior Advisor to the President,
American Association of Colleges & Universities (AAC&U)
Ashley Finley
Professors